Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
A very happy new year to all of you. Welcoming the new year with a thermo sudoku. I had created this sudoku before the 2019 themed thermo s...
-
RULES : Classic sudoku rules apply. Adjacent digits along each marked line have a difference of at least 5.
-
RULES: Classic Sudoku rules apply. Additionally, digits along the given lines read the same from either direction on the line.
-
RULES : Classic Sudoku rules apply. Additionally, each group of nine shaded cells must also contain the digits 1 to 9. Online Solving
-
RULES : Place a digit from 1 to 9 in each empty cell so that each digit appears exactly once in each row, column and 3x3 box. Solve Onlin...
-
Triple Sum Sudoku for GP practice RULES : Each row is divided into 3 parts. The 1st part is a 4-digit number, the 2nd part (sh...
-
RULES : Classic sudoku rules apply. If a grey circle is given between two adjacent cells, then the numbers in those cells will be consecu...
-
This classic sudoku is taken from my new book WORLD OF SUDOKU : VOL # 4. The book contains 120 handcrafted classic sudokus ranging from mo...
-
It is an amazing feeling to reach 200 sudokus on my blog today. I had started this blog in the year 2017. The year 2020 started with Sudoku...
-
RULES : Classic sudoku rules apply. Additionally, orthogonally adjacent cells cannot contain consecutive digits. Also, a digit cannot repe...
Puzzle No. 462: XV Sudoku
RULES: Place a digit from 1 to 9 in each empty cell so that each digit appears exactly once in each row, column and 3x3 outlined box. If t...
12:36, struggled in the classic part
ReplyDeleteYes. Classic part was a bit sticky but it was logical
DeleteProduct part of this is a star.One guessing inr9c8 made classical part easy.Enjoyed.
ReplyDeleteThere was no need to guess in the classic part. It was solvable using the basic sudoku techniques
Delete9:16, took a while to get a hang of it but flowed smoothly
ReplyDeleteGood timing actually.
Delete10:18. I am surprised seeing the times because I broke it badly and somehow fixed it.I expected to see times faster than me by atleast 4-5 minutes
ReplyDeleteThe classic part was a bit sticky. 10.18 is a decent timing
Delete