Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
A very happy new year to all of you. Welcoming the new year with a thermo sudoku. I had created this sudoku before the 2019 themed thermo s... -
RULES : Classic sudoku rules apply. Adjacent digits along each marked line have a difference of at least 5. -
Triple Sum Sudoku for GP practice RULES : Each row is divided into 3 parts. The 1st part is a 4-digit number, the 2nd part (sh... -
RULES : Place a digit from 1 to 9 in each empty cell so that each digit appears exactly once in each row, column and 3x3 box. Solve Online -
RULES : Classic Sudoku rules apply. Additionally, each group of nine shaded cells must also contain the digits 1 to 9. Online Solving -
RULES : Classic sudoku rules apply. If a grey circle is given between two adjacent cells, then the numbers in those cells will be consecu... -
It is an amazing feeling to reach 200 sudokus on my blog today. I had started this blog in the year 2017. The year 2020 started with Sudoku... -
This classic sudoku is taken from my new book WORLD OF SUDOKU : VOL # 4. The book contains 120 handcrafted classic sudokus ranging from mo... -
My daughter is a big fan of BTS. So here is a BTS themed thermo sudoku on her order :) RULES : Classic sudoku rules apply. Additionally, ... -
RULES : Classic sudoku rules apply. Additionally, orthogonally adjacent cells cannot contain consecutive digits. Also, a digit cannot repe...
Puzzle No. 430: Consecutive Pairs Sudoku
RULES: Place a digit from 1 to 9 in each empty cell so that each digit appears exactly once in each row, column and 3x3 outlined box. If ...
15:43.Logical solve involving a cluster of techniques at the end.Good one.Would have guessed in a contest as it would have been faster
ReplyDeleteYes. Guessing would have finished this faster. But I m sure u wouldn't have enjoyed the guessing way to finish it.
Delete5:41. I was fortunate enough to spot very quickly a configuration I usually miss. Good one.
ReplyDeleteThat is amazing timing.
Delete7:24, the ending was tricky.
ReplyDeleteAmazing timing on this
DeleteCouldn't spot the logic at the end, but a nice logical solve
ReplyDelete